When We Observe the Death Spiral of the Cult of Attacking Play, Let’s Appreciate Its Impact.
The Life Cycle of a Phenomenon can be marked by clear stages.
1. The Core Concept
An inspiring figure or leaders present a revolutionary approach offering a solution for struggling players.
So here we are. They’re getting ready to challenge the establishment down in Brisbane. The gunships are circling. Conflict emerges from the out-houses. An isolated player, vulnerable, shivering, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET written on his body as a statement, has stumbled through the lines and is taken aside in secrecy for a temporary assignment in county cricket.
Do you recall the start, when the world was still young? The era of early Bazball, of uninhibited aggression.
2. The Honeymoon Phase
Cult leaders offer a fresh beginning, optimism ahead, love, redemption among a group united in belief in the method.
How did it feel initially? Just men on a balcony enjoying success. Tattoos. Muscles. Determination. Confident masculinity. Oh sure, England’s players often say it’s not a real term, which is funny because if it doesn’t exist, what exactly did I just watch?
But we know its essence. It’s the batsman executing a stroke so outrageous it’s beyond belief. It’s the excitement of the captain in his final form, an expression conveying: focused titan, rugged appearance, natural look, so authentically Modern Savage you wouldn’t be surprised to notice and see him playing on the ground stripped to the waist and cradling a wild salmon.
It’s the batsman still being allowed speaking publicly, out there looking like a joyful figure formally attired, expressing thoughts like we’re breaking down traditions. Indeed, the atmosphere, for quite a long time, was only good energy.
3. Expansion Period
Development stage. Cohesion maintained via memorization of the cult’s slogans. These principles can appear contradictory as a loyalty check.
Am I alone? The backlash, the fury, the disappointment post-defeat feels overblown, unwarranted. The batting collapsed on the field, as they often do in Australia. They were dominated defensively in a short span when tactics failed, carved around by the batsman batting like England but better, adaptive to conditions, a man playing with a kind of light around him.
And now we have this the pile-on, the rage, the perception of the team as a kind of abomination. The consensus is that defeat must be total, they should be dismantled, to be purged, destroyed, defeated via traditional methods of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the low-fi orthodoxies of Scott Boland, out there celebrating successes with a bashful smile like he’s just been given a nice new fishing rod. What will this do to them?
4. External Conflict
Problems arise due to setbacks. But the cult cannot admit errors. It starts to feed on anger towards critics.
In truth, approaching the next match, we have now reached an intriguing moment in the journey of this thing. England could quite easily win in the next Test with bold tactics. Alternatively, failure may follow. And if they do lose it seems we could be witnessing the decline.
Prior to that, a couple of points to consider on the topic. More than two years ago, during the initial excitement, of optimism and energy, an piece was published calling it a phenomenon. People were very angry, which proved the point since it’s clear how to confirm lack of cult status is should followers respond with anger objecting to the questioning of the philosophy.
Recent events in the last few days are equally notable. Opposition to the style has now become the cult. Social media is furious, critical analysts, pictures of upset supporters abroad cheated out of three days of cricket, reminiscent of people wanting fairness.
On the other hand, there is the broader context of the host’s complex ingrained annoyance at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, claiming, the methods you value and have honed as part of your identity from others, it’s just a joke ultimately.
Here lies the truth. All movements are similar. Bazball was a cult as the game has its own culture. Or rather, the team has long been exclusive, a clique, a garden party, a restricted environment with a long history of ceremonial past supporting it. This has always been where entry is limited. It’s the British pastime of the British, the early image-makers. And notably, the nation has its own culture, a structure of hidden ranks, a place that literally still has a king.
England’s cricketers have been isolated in this environment for years. In trying to escape from it, to foster positivity, they are simply replicating their upbringing, forming a new circle, a closed circle, however with 15 cool guys and a coach promoting authenticity if you fit the mold.
Stay present. Embrace challenges. However much you change, you’re always basically in the same place.
Reflecting on this, it might be appropriate to offer compassion for the approach, to appreciate its good points, that are numerous. How to define it? Promoting liberation. Challenging orthodoxies. Batting aggressively|Attacking with