🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to scrub Black history and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that face all if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.