🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach only to fire him for using excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and then bin him for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.