🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed new appeals had originated from go-betweens to restart talks with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Path

The foreign minister is treading a challenging route since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries employed their authority to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Position

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in some form if discussions resume.

The American leader in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of international law, Araghchi stated the 12-day war demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the attacks began with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and stays the primary answer to address disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will receive a reply in the identical tone."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The nation of Iran have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the face of this attack."