🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."