🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils is set to be cut by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote backed Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to create other types of wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.