🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

A letter obtained by media sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a draft bill that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during wider concerns about industry interference with public health regulations. Last month, international health experts issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be lowered to 30% or 50% “according to global recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for various offences “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia states the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its activities following with current country statutes. Additionally, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the representative commented, mentioning that minors should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to achieve intended public health goals, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, mentioning that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which encompasses rising levels of black market activity”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.